Immigrants from Uruguay vs Croatian In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,256,636 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,744,392 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 80.1%, a difference of 0.080%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uruguay	Croatian
Minimum	57.8%	49.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	42.2%	50.7%
Mean	79.4%	76.8%
Median	80.3%	79.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	76.9%	75.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	81.0%	81.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.9%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.7%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Croatians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Asia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Jordanian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Colombian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Latvia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Immigrants \| Japan	97.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 80.1%
Colombians	97.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 80.1%
Jordanians	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.1 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 80.1%
Croatians	97.1 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 80.1%
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	96.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 80.1%
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%