Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,643,562 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 86.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,900,953 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 0.52%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sierra Leone	Norwegian
Minimum	70.5%	70.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	29.5%	29.6%
Mean	88.2%	89.2%
Median	87.8%	88.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.3%	85.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.9%	91.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.0%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.0%	5.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Norwegians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (86.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ethiopian (85.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Somalia (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Sierra Leoneans	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 86.4%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 86.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 86.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%