Immigrants from Jamaica vs Celtic In Labor Force | Age 45-54

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,584,451 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 82.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,844,950 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 81.8%, a difference of 0.41%.

In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jamaica	Celtic
Minimum	73.0%	49.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	27.0%	51.0%
Mean	84.2%	78.7%
Median	82.8%	80.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	81.5%	72.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	85.5%	85.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.0%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.6%	12.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.5%	12.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Celtics by In Labor Force | Age 45-54

In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Oceania (82.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Caribbean (82.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (82.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Cape Verdean (82.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (82.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Samoan (81.8%, a difference of 0.090%), White/Caucasian (81.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (81.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (81.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Thailand (81.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 45-54
Immigrants \| Jamaica	2.7 /100 \| #224	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	2.5 /100 \| #225	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	2.5 /100 \| #226	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	2.4 /100 \| #227	Tragic 82.1%
Cape Verdeans	2.1 /100 \| #228	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	1.9 /100 \| #229	Tragic 82.0%
Jamaicans	1.8 /100 \| #230	Tragic 82.0%
Immigrants \| Senegal	1.7 /100 \| #231	Tragic 82.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	1.7 /100 \| #232	Tragic 82.0%
Malaysians	1.7 /100 \| #233	Tragic 82.0%
Salvadorans	1.7 /100 \| #234	Tragic 82.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	1.2 /100 \| #235	Tragic 82.0%
Basques	1.2 /100 \| #236	Tragic 82.0%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	1.2 /100 \| #237	Tragic 82.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	1.1 /100 \| #238	Tragic 81.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	1.0 /100 \| #239	Tragic 81.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	1.0 /100 \| #240	Tragic 81.9%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	0.8 /100 \| #241	Tragic 81.9%
Whites/Caucasians	0.7 /100 \| #242	Tragic 81.9%
Samoans	0.6 /100 \| #243	Tragic 81.8%
Celtics	0.4 /100 \| #244	Tragic 81.8%