Croatian vs Immigrants from Malaysia In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,744,392 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,972,678 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 80.1%, a difference of 0.070%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Croatian	Immigrants from Malaysia
Minimum	49.3%	65.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	50.7%	34.6%
Mean	76.8%	80.3%
Median	79.4%	80.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	75.0%	78.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	81.1%	82.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.5%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.5%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Malaysia by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Jordanian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Colombian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Latvia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uruguay (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Asia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
German Russians	97.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Japan	97.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 80.1%
Colombians	97.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 80.1%
Jordanians	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.1 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 80.1%
Croatians	97.1 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 80.1%
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	96.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 80.1%
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%