Burmese vs Immigrants from Scotland In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,995,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 84.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,377,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Burmese	Immigrants from Scotland
Minimum	66.7%	65.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	33.3%	34.3%
Mean	86.5%	86.7%
Median	84.8%	85.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.7%	81.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.2%	91.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.4%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.8%	7.8%

Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Scotland by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Northern Europe (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and German (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Palestinian (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Bhutanese (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Austrian (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ghana (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from South America (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Bahamians	93.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	92.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| China	92.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	92.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 84.7%
Burmese	91.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 84.7%
Finns	91.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 84.7%
Germans	91.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| South America	90.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 84.7%
Slavs	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 84.7%
Maltese	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 84.7%
Asians	90.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Spain	90.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Ghana	90.4 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 84.7%
Palestinians	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 84.7%
Bhutanese	89.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 84.7%
Immigrants \| Scotland	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 84.7%
Austrians	89.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 84.7%
Argentineans	88.4 /100 \| #133	Excellent 84.6%
Immigrants \| Korea	88.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 84.6%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 84.6%