Burmese vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,995,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 84.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,478,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Burmese	Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Minimum	66.7%	72.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	33.3%	27.3%
Mean	86.5%	84.9%
Median	84.8%	84.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.7%	83.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.2%	86.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.4%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.8%	4.6%

Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Northern Europe (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), German (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Egypt (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from China (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and German (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Argentina	94.5 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Russia	94.5 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 84.8%
Filipinos	93.8 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 84.7%
Ukrainians	93.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	93.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 84.7%
Uruguayans	93.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 84.7%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 84.7%
Bahamians	93.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	92.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| China	92.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	92.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 84.7%
Burmese	91.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 84.7%
Finns	91.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 84.7%
Germans	91.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| South America	90.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 84.7%
Slavs	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 84.7%
Maltese	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 84.7%
Asians	90.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Spain	90.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Ghana	90.4 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 84.7%