American vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
American
Chippewa
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Americans
Chippewa
83.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,038,437 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 83.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,004,507 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 82.9%, a difference of 0.22%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | American | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 39.0% | 29.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.0% | 70.7% |
| Mean | 80.1% | 80.2% |
| Median | 80.6% | 83.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 76.3% | 72.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.0% | 92.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Chippewa by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from the Azores (83.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Nicaraguan (83.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Dominican (83.2%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nepalese (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Potawatomi (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 83.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 83.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 83.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 83.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 83.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 83.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 83.1% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 83.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 83.0% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.9% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.9% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.9% |