Immigrants from South Africa vs Soviet Union Median Family Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,253,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228 and weighted average of $116,286. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,509,630 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of $119,262, a difference of 2.6%.

Median Family Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Soviet Union
Minimum	$63,496	$48,254
Maximum	$176,195	$250,001
Range	$112,699	$201,747
Mean	$115,244	$137,051
Median	$114,820	$132,006
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$87,615	$109,232
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$137,250	$157,989
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$49,635	$48,757
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$31,957	$44,628
Standard Deviation (Population)	$31,402	$44,180

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union by Median Family Income

In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Chinese ($116,188, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia ($116,165, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($115,880, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Austria ($116,830, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Russia ($116,942, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Bolivian ($119,479, a difference of 0.18%), Bhutanese ($119,800, a difference of 0.45%), Asian ($119,955, a difference of 0.58%), Israeli ($118,577, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from France ($120,076, a difference of 0.68%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Median Family Income
Immigrants \| France	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $120,076
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $119,955
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $119,800
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $119,479
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $119,262
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $118,577
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $118,440
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $118,325
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $118,291
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $118,053
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $118,013
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $117,912
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $117,818
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $117,780
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $117,344
Immigrants \| Russia	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $116,942
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $116,830
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $116,286
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $116,188
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $116,165
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $115,880