Tsimshian vs Canadian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Canadian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Tsimshian
Canadians
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
7.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Canadian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,085,688 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Canadian |
Minimum | 13.6% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.9% | 93.1% |
Mean | 25.9% | 31.4% |
Median | 26.6% | 26.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.2% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Canadians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Czechoslovakian (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Luxembourger (27.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Czechoslovakian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pima (27.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |