Sudanese vs Osage Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Sudanese
Osage
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Sudanese
Osage
32.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
27.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
37.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Osage Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,881,308 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 32.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,866,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 32.1%, a difference of 1.1%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Osage |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.4% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 33.6% | 41.9% |
| Median | 31.5% | 33.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.5% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.0% | 48.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 26.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Osage by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Fijian (32.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Colombian (32.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and Samoan (32.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (32.0%, a difference of 0.11%), German (32.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South America (32.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Peru | 45.1 /100 | #181 | Average 31.8% |
| Kenyans | 43.0 /100 | #182 | Average 31.9% |
| Canadians | 41.4 /100 | #183 | Average 31.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 40.7 /100 | #184 | Average 32.0% |
| Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
| Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
| Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
| Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
| Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
| Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
| Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
| Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |