Kiowa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households
COMPARE
Kiowa
Tlingit-Haida
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Kiowa
Tlingit-Haida
61.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412 and weighted average of 61.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,548 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 61.6%, a difference of 0.36%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 40.0% | 41.2% |
Maximum | 77.4% | 80.0% |
Range | 37.4% | 38.8% |
Mean | 62.3% | 62.4% |
Median | 62.6% | 63.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.1% | 57.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Tlingit-Haida by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Cambodian (61.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Black/African American (61.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Indonesian (61.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (61.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (61.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 61.1% |