Immigrants from South Africa vs Iranian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Iranian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Iranians
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Iranian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,989 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.31%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Iranian |
Minimum | 23.8% | 26.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 94.9% |
Range | 76.2% | 68.2% |
Mean | 66.2% | 64.0% |
Median | 64.6% | 64.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.5% | 59.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.3% | 70.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.1% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.9% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Iranians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |