Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from China Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from China
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from China
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from China Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,815,844 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,380,554 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 0.35%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 7.8% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 44.2% | 41.6% |
| Range | 36.3% | 37.5% |
| Mean | 26.9% | 26.7% |
| Median | 28.0% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
| Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |
| Turks | 46.9 /100 | #179 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 46.9 /100 | #180 | Average 27.4% |