Immigrants from France vs Sri Lankan Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,306,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,137,985 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of 28.9%, a difference of 0.16%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from France	Sri Lankan
Minimum	17.9%	6.9%
Maximum	100.0%	69.0%
Range	82.1%	62.1%
Mean	49.9%	29.5%
Median	26.9%	29.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	23.2%	24.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	100.0%	34.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	76.8%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	36.1%	10.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	34.7%	10.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Sri Lankans by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (29.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Poland (28.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Latvia (29.1%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Jordan (29.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (28.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (28.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Israelis	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	98.3 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.6%
Zimbabweans	98.2 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.7%
Danes	98.2 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	98.1 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.1 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.7%
Romanians	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.8%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.6 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.9%
Sri Lankans	97.5 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Jordan	97.4 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 29.0%
Taiwanese	97.3 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| France	97.3 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	97.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	96.6 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 29.2%
Arabs	96.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 29.2%
Estonians	96.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 29.2%
Ukrainians	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 29.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	96.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 29.3%
Norwegians	95.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 29.3%