Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Pima Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Pima
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Pima
26.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Pima Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,398,985 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208 and weighted average of 26.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Pima |
Minimum | 5.5% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 50.0% |
Range | 40.8% | 36.2% |
Mean | 22.0% | 29.2% |
Median | 23.1% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Colville (26.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Marshallese (26.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Somalia (26.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Cree (26.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Lumbee (26.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic 26.3% |
Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #306 | Tragic 26.3% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 26.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 26.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 26.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 26.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 26.2% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 26.2% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 26.1% |
Estonians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 26.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |