Immigrants from Cuba vs Pueblo Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Pueblo
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Pueblo
68.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
68.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Pueblo Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,966,420 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 68.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,067,636 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 68.2%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Pueblo |
Minimum | 43.2% | 33.6% |
Maximum | 87.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.5% | 66.4% |
Mean | 69.8% | 71.0% |
Median | 70.8% | 69.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 62.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.2% | 82.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Pueblo by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (68.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (68.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Central America (68.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Korean (68.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (68.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Central America (68.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |