Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Single Father Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Iroquois
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Iroquois
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Iroquois Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,764,180 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,362,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 9.2% |
| Range | 7.0% | 8.6% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 4.1% |
| Median | 2.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Iroquois by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Ottawa (2.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American Indian (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Puerto Rican (2.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Creek (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Seminole (2.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (2.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Seminole | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.2 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.2 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |