Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Single Father Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Pakistan
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Pakistan
2.1%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,482,279 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,609,848 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.876 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.060%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 0.45% | 0.53% |
Maximum | 7.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 7.4% | 99.5% |
Mean | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Pakistan by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Armenia (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Armenia (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Armenians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 99.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 99.6 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ukrainians | 99.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Bermudans | 99.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Arabs | 99.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Guyanese | 99.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
South Africans | 99.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |