Latvian vs Danish 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Latvian
Danish
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Latvians
Danes
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.5%
2ND GRADE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Danish 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,726,452 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428 and weighted average of 98.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,193,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Danish |
| Minimum | 97.2% | 97.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Mean | 99.5% | 99.6% |
| Median | 99.7% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 99.0% | 99.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 0.63% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.66% | 0.51% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66% | 0.50% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Danes by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Chippewa (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Italian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Swiss (98.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Sioux (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and Scotch-Irish (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.4% |