Finnish vs Chippewa 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Finnish
 Chippewa
 2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Finns
Chippewa
98.5%
2ND GRADE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Chippewa 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,675,516 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 98.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,065,644 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%.
 
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 97.9% | 95.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 2.1% | 4.3% | 
| Mean | 99.4% | 99.3% | 
| Median | 99.4% | 99.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 99.2% | 99.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 99.9% | 100.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48% | 0.88% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.47% | 0.88% | 
Demographics Similar to Finns and Chippewa by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Sioux (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Danish (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and Pennsylvania German (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Latvian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Italian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Chinese (98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade | 
| Finns | 100.0 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| French | 100.0 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 98.4%  |