Cajun vs Chickasaw No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Cajun
Chickasaw
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Cajuns
Chickasaw
1.7%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.7%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Chickasaw No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,907,341 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 1.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,942,262 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 1.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 0.11% |
| Maximum | 10.3% | 4.2% |
| Range | 10.1% | 4.1% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Median | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 0.57% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 0.81% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Chickasaw by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from England (1.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from India (1.7%, a difference of 0.48%), Zimbabwean (1.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Netherlands (1.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Belgium (1.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Lithuania (1.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Netherlands (1.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Austria (1.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Canadian (1.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from England (1.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
| Americans | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Tsimshian | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Russians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| New Zealanders | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Serbians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Chickasaw | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Cajuns | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Delaware | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 1.7% |