Uruguayan vs Jordanian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Jordanian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Jordanians
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Jordanian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,784,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,416,373 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.539 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 0.33%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 24.0% | 19.7% |
| Range | 18.9% | 15.3% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 15.2% |
| Median | 15.2% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Jordanians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Arapaho (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Korean (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Russia (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Irish (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (16.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Dutch (16.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| English | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Finns | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Dutch | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Jordanians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Irish | 98.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Paraguayans | 98.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Palestinians | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |