New Zealander vs Costa Rican Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
New Zealander
Costa Rican
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
New Zealanders
Costa Ricans
22.9%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,853,800 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 22.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,274,171 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248 and weighted average of 22.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 58.3% | 40.7% |
| Range | 51.8% | 33.1% |
| Mean | 25.4% | 19.6% |
| Median | 21.9% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Costa Ricans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Swiss (22.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (22.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Alsatian (22.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uganda (22.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (22.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (22.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan (22.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Albania (22.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (22.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 89.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 88.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Afghans | 88.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Ethiopians | 87.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Taiwanese | 87.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 87.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Ugandans | 85.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Belgians | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Arabs | 84.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 22.8% |
| Danes | 84.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 22.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 84.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 22.8% |
| Alsatians | 83.7 /100 | #146 | Excellent 22.8% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 22.8% |
| New Zealanders | 79.9 /100 | #148 | Good 22.9% |
| Swiss | 79.7 /100 | #149 | Good 22.9% |
| Canadians | 77.7 /100 | #150 | Good 22.9% |