Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,319,644 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 45.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,428,919 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 45.1%, a difference of 0.10%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	2.2%	4.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	97.8%	95.6%
Mean	51.4%	46.5%
Median	46.1%	43.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	42.7%	36.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	56.1%	48.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.4%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.1%	20.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.0%	20.6%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bulgarian (45.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (45.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (45.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (45.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Paraguayan (45.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Latvian (45.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (45.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (45.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Bulgarian (45.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (45.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 43.5%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 44.7%
Eastern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 44.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 44.8%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 44.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 44.9%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 44.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 44.9%
Paraguayans	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 45.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 45.1%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 45.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 45.1%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 45.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 45.1%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 45.1%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 45.2%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 45.2%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 45.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 45.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 45.3%
Immigrants \| Belgium	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 45.3%