Kiowa vs Yup'ik Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Yup'ik
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Kiowa
Yup'ik
4.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Yup'ik Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,096,605 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,958,202 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Yup'ik | 
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 15.1% | 16.7% | 
| Range | 12.2% | 14.8% | 
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.8% | 
| Median | 6.3% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Yup'ik by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Creek (4.4%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), Alaskan Athabascan (5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 20.6%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 24.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 4.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 5.3%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 5.3%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 5.8%  |