Kenyan vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,175,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.20%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Immigrants from Sierra Leone |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 12.2% |
Range | 11.9% | 10.0% |
Mean | 6.2% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |