Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Malaysia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Malaysia
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,549,615 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,931,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 4.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Malaysia |
| Minimum | 0.11% | 0.037% |
| Maximum | 5.9% | 10.8% |
| Range | 5.8% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Median | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36% | 0.58% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.60% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.60% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Malaysia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Burmese (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |