Immigrants from Singapore vs Immigrants Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Immigrants
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Immigrants
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Immigrants Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,473,730 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 575,432,160 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.37% |
| Maximum | 6.6% | 12.9% |
| Range | 6.2% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Median | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.38% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Immigrants from Hong Kong (1.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Iranian (1.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Canadian (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and European (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |