Immigrants from Ireland vs Bolivian Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,729,151 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,604,467 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 6.7%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Ireland	Bolivian
Minimum	1.8%	1.0%
Maximum	28.6%	25.5%
Range	26.8%	24.5%
Mean	9.7%	8.2%
Median	8.8%	7.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	5.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.4%	9.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.3%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.2%	4.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Bolivians by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Japan (9.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Asia (9.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Singapore (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Korea (9.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.9%, a difference of 0.89%), Indian (Asian) (8.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and Burmese (9.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 8.9%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 8.9%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 8.9%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 8.9%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 9.0%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 9.2%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 9.3%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 9.3%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 9.4%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 9.4%
Argentineans	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 9.4%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 9.4%
Venezuelans	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 9.6%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 9.7%