Immigrants from Grenada vs Laotian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
 Laotian
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Laotians
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Laotian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,197,352 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,854,560 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.88%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Laotian | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.1% | 
| Maximum | 16.2% | 30.4% | 
| Range | 14.9% | 26.3% | 
| Mean | 10.4% | 12.0% | 
| Median | 11.2% | 10.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 9.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 14.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada and Laotians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Ecuadorian (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 10.6%  |