Immigrants from Fiji vs Slavic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
 Slavic
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Slavs
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
47.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Slavic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,750,153 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.968 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.11%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Slavic | 
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 20.2% | 14.1% | 
| Range | 18.8% | 13.7% | 
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.9% | 
| Median | 2.1% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.56% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji and Slavs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Scandinavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% | 
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% | 
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% | 
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% | 
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% | 
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% | 
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% | 
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% | 
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% | 
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% | 
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |