Immigrants from North America vs Slavic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Slavic
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Slavs
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
44.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Slavic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,875,281 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.090%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Slavic |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 14.1% |
| Range | 14.2% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 2.9% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Slavs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |