Houma vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 18 to 34
COMPARE
Houma
Alaskan Athabascan
Disability Age 18 to 34
Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison
Houma
Alaskan Athabascans
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,777,959 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,771,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 2.7%.

Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 4.7% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 43.3% | 49.4% |
Mean | 13.6% | 15.0% |
Median | 10.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Alaskan Athabascans by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Creek (9.0%, a difference of 7.6%), Chippewa (9.0%, a difference of 8.0%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 8.0%), Chickasaw (9.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and Choctaw (9.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Creek (9.0%, a difference of 4.8%), Chippewa (9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), Chickasaw (9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and Choctaw (9.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 8.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.8% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 9.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 9.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 9.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 10.6% |