Chilean vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,435,709 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,242,093 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 46.4%, a difference of 0.040%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chilean	Immigrants from Uruguay
Minimum	10.0%	26.7%
Maximum	69.8%	88.0%
Range	59.8%	61.3%
Mean	45.2%	49.2%
Median	45.6%	45.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	39.3%	40.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	52.3%	50.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.1%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.7%	16.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.6%	15.6%

Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Uruguay by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Hong Kong (46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Pakistan (46.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (46.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Brazilian (46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (46.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (46.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Chile (46.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Immigrants \| Japan	97.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 46.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	97.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 46.3%
Mongolians	97.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 46.4%
Ukrainians	97.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 46.4%
Israelis	97.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	96.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	96.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	96.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 46.4%
Brazilians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 46.5%
Chileans	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	96.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	96.1 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 46.5%
Irish	96.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 46.5%
Dutch	95.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 46.5%
British	95.7 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 46.5%
Indians (Asian)	95.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 46.5%
Hungarians	95.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 46.5%
Czechoslovakians	94.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 46.6%