Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.7410399.2%34.1%(+65.1)#535.2%(+64.0)#325
2.7411975.1%34.1%(+41.1)#1135.2%(+39.9)#831
3.7412066.1%34.1%(+32.1)#1435.2%(+30.9)#1,295
4.7414665.3%34.1%(+31.2)#1635.2%(+30.1)#1,363
5.7413663.2%34.1%(+29.1)#1935.2%(+28.0)#1,538
6.7411655.3%34.1%(+21.2)#3235.2%(+20.1)#2,297
7.7410653.0%34.1%(+18.9)#3735.2%(+17.8)#2,619
8.7410452.6%34.1%(+18.6)#3835.2%(+17.5)#2,675
9.7412950.2%34.1%(+16.2)#4435.2%(+15.0)#3,044
10.7413348.6%34.1%(+14.6)#4635.2%(+13.4)#3,340
11.7411048.6%34.1%(+14.6)#4735.2%(+13.4)#3,345
12.7413548.1%34.1%(+14.1)#5035.2%(+12.9)#3,419
13.7410747.2%34.1%(+13.2)#5435.2%(+12.1)#3,599
14.7410545.7%34.1%(+11.7)#5835.2%(+10.6)#3,899
15.7411545.2%34.1%(+11.1)#6035.2%(+9.97)#4,022
16.7411244.1%34.1%(+10.0)#6735.2%(+8.88)#4,303
17.7413244.0%34.1%(+9.90)#6835.2%(+8.78)#4,334
18.7414542.4%34.1%(+8.39)#7635.2%(+7.26)#4,724
19.7412742.0%34.1%(+7.99)#8035.2%(+6.87)#4,827
20.7412840.3%34.1%(+6.22)#8935.2%(+5.09)#5,326
21.7412639.1%34.1%(+5.04)#9535.2%(+3.92)#5,690
22.7413434.7%34.1%(+0.631)#12735.2%(-0.493)#7,509
23.7413732.2%34.1%(-1.83)#15635.2%(-2.96)#8,716
24.7410832.2%34.1%(-1.83)#15735.2%(-2.96)#8,717
25.7413030.3%34.1%(-3.79)#17735.2%(-4.91)#9,888
26.7411422.1%34.1%(-12.0)#35435.2%(-13.1)#16,278
27.7413120.9%34.1%(-13.1)#37535.2%(-14.3)#17,358

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
99.2%
#2
75.1%
#3
66.1%
#4
65.3%
#5
63.2%
#6
55.3%
#7
53.0%
#8
52.6%
#9
50.2%
#10
48.6%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK with 99.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa is 47.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 34.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.