Immigrants from North America vs Portuguese 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,241,912 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 91.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,036,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 91.6%, a difference of 0.20%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North America	Portuguese
Minimum	81.6%	78.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	18.4%	21.5%
Mean	95.2%	93.8%
Median	95.9%	94.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	92.5%	91.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	100.0%	98.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.0%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.9%	5.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Portuguese by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Bhutanese (91.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Cuban (91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (91.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Iranian (91.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (91.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (91.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Lebanon	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 91.6%
Portuguese	99.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 91.6%
Cubans	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 91.5%
Iranians	99.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 91.5%
Bolivians	99.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	99.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 91.4%
Lebanese	99.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| England	99.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 91.4%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 91.4%
Tsimshian	99.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 91.4%
Osage	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 91.4%
Spanish Americans	99.2 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 91.4%
Bangladeshis	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 91.4%
Bhutanese	99.2 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| North America	99.2 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 91.3%