Ute vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Ute
Zimbabwean
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Ute
Zimbabweans
6.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,734,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,414,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 41.1% | 28.3% |
Range | 39.7% | 25.4% |
Mean | 13.0% | 7.8% |
Median | 7.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Zimbabweans by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Armenia (6.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Puerto Rican (6.4%, a difference of 2.4%), Taiwanese (6.3%, a difference of 3.5%), Paiute (6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (6.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Aleut (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bahamas (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Dominica (6.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Mexico (6.0%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 5.9% |
Zimbabweans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 5.9% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 6.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 6.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 6.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 6.0% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 6.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.3% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 6.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 6.3% |
Taiwanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 6.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 6.5% |