Osage vs Czech Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
COMPARE
Osage
Czech
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Comparison
Osage
Czechs
9.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Czech Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,596,996 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,027,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 0.57%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Czech |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 59.4% |
Range | 51.0% | 56.8% |
Mean | 11.9% | 14.4% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Czechs by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chinese (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Nepal (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Chinese (9.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Danish (9.3%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Sudan (9.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |