Immigrants from Ukraine vs Sudanese Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,214,660 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 18 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,134,531 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 18 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.71%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Ukraine	Sudanese
Minimum	2.7%	0.70%
Maximum	13.2%	15.2%
Range	10.5%	14.5%
Mean	5.9%	5.6%
Median	5.3%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.4%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.9%	6.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	2.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	2.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine and Sudanese by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Jordanian (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), New Zealander (5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slovak (5.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Native Hawaiian (5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Scotch-Irish (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and White/Caucasian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years
Immigrants \| Romania	85.8 /100 \| #121	Excellent 5.3%
Scotch-Irish	85.7 /100 \| #122	Excellent 5.3%
Sudanese	84.3 /100 \| #123	Excellent 5.3%
Native Hawaiians	84.0 /100 \| #124	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	83.2 /100 \| #125	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	83.1 /100 \| #126	Excellent 5.3%
Whites/Caucasians	82.9 /100 \| #127	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	82.8 /100 \| #128	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Italy	82.3 /100 \| #129	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Austria	82.1 /100 \| #130	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Israel	81.9 /100 \| #131	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	81.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 5.3%
Ethiopians	80.7 /100 \| #133	Excellent 5.3%
Slovaks	80.5 /100 \| #134	Excellent 5.3%
New Zealanders	79.9 /100 \| #135	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	79.5 /100 \| #136	Good 5.3%
Jordanians	78.8 /100 \| #137	Good 5.3%
Argentineans	78.8 /100 \| #138	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	78.5 /100 \| #139	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	76.2 /100 \| #140	Good 5.3%
Venezuelans	76.0 /100 \| #141	Good 5.3%