Immigrants from Scotland vs Hungarian Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,448,395 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,669,965 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.010%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Scotland	Hungarian
Minimum	2.9%	4.2%
Maximum	40.0%	66.7%
Range	37.1%	62.5%
Mean	13.9%	15.1%
Median	10.2%	10.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.2%	9.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.1%	14.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.9%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.4%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	11.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Hungarians by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from South Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Romania (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Iranian (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from South Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Iranian (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Uruguayans	81.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Austria	81.4 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	81.4 /100 \| #141	Excellent 10.2%
Slovaks	80.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	79.0 /100 \| #143	Good 10.2%
Brazilians	78.4 /100 \| #144	Good 10.2%
Argentineans	78.0 /100 \| #145	Good 10.2%
Asians	77.7 /100 \| #146	Good 10.2%
French Canadians	77.5 /100 \| #147	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	75.7 /100 \| #148	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Scotland	74.6 /100 \| #149	Good 10.2%
Hungarians	74.4 /100 \| #150	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| South Africa	73.6 /100 \| #151	Good 10.2%
Iranians	72.4 /100 \| #152	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	71.4 /100 \| #153	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	71.3 /100 \| #154	Good 10.2%
Lithuanians	70.0 /100 \| #155	Good 10.2%
Canadians	66.7 /100 \| #156	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Uganda	65.6 /100 \| #157	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	65.5 /100 \| #158	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| England	63.7 /100 \| #159	Good 10.3%