Immigrants from North America vs Romanian Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,976,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 366,181,336 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.080%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North America	Romanian
Minimum	0.90%	4.8%
Maximum	48.8%	100.0%
Range	47.9%	95.2%
Mean	16.4%	16.6%
Median	13.1%	10.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.3%	9.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.9%	16.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.6%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	19.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.9%	18.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Romanians by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Burmese (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Austrian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Seminole (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Spanish	86.1 /100 \| #125	Excellent 10.1%
Jordanians	86.1 /100 \| #126	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| Norway	85.3 /100 \| #127	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.9 /100 \| #128	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	84.6 /100 \| #129	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	84.2 /100 \| #130	Excellent 10.1%
Seminole	84.2 /100 \| #131	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	84.0 /100 \| #132	Excellent 10.1%
Austrians	83.9 /100 \| #133	Excellent 10.2%
Romanians	83.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 10.2%
Comanche	83.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	82.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| North America	82.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 10.2%
Burmese	82.3 /100 \| #138	Excellent 10.2%
Uruguayans	81.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Austria	81.4 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	81.4 /100 \| #141	Excellent 10.2%
Slovaks	80.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	79.0 /100 \| #143	Good 10.2%
Brazilians	78.4 /100 \| #144	Good 10.2%
Argentineans	78.0 /100 \| #145	Good 10.2%