Immigrants from Morocco vs Choctaw Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,914,481 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,585,593 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.79%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Morocco	Choctaw
Minimum	1.1%	1.3%
Maximum	14.7%	37.0%
Range	13.6%	35.7%
Mean	5.6%	10.1%
Median	4.8%	6.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	4.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.6%	13.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.3%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.8%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.7%	8.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco and Choctaw by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Macedonian (4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (4.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from England (4.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Serbia (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yaqui (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Bulgarians	96.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Maltese	96.5 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	96.4 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| England	96.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.7%
Ukrainians	96.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Morocco	95.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.7%
Macedonians	95.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.7%
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.8%
Lithuanians	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.8%
Yaqui	89.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 4.8%