Immigrants from Hong Kong vs New Zealander Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,925,939 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,646,016 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.776 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	New Zealander
Minimum	1.0%	0.82%
Maximum	14.9%	35.1%
Range	13.9%	34.3%
Mean	5.4%	9.8%
Median	5.1%	6.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.9%	4.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.1%	13.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	8.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and New Zealanders by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from North America (5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Eastern European (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Turkish (5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Canadian (5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Laos (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Pakistanis	87.5 /100 \| #125	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	87.2 /100 \| #126	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| North America	86.7 /100 \| #127	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	86.5 /100 \| #128	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| England	86.2 /100 \| #129	Excellent 5.3%
Eastern Europeans	85.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Russia	83.0 /100 \| #131	Excellent 5.3%
Koreans	82.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 5.3%
Ukrainians	82.0 /100 \| #133	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Panama	81.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	81.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 5.3%
Celtics	80.8 /100 \| #136	Excellent 5.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	80.8 /100 \| #137	Excellent 5.3%
Chileans	79.7 /100 \| #138	Good 5.3%
Finns	79.0 /100 \| #139	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Laos	78.6 /100 \| #140	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Asia	78.4 /100 \| #141	Good 5.3%
Turks	76.2 /100 \| #142	Good 5.3%
New Zealanders	76.1 /100 \| #143	Good 5.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	76.0 /100 \| #144	Good 5.3%
Canadians	75.0 /100 \| #145	Good 5.3%