Immigrants from France vs Scandinavian Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,426,398 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,811,713 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.020%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from France	Scandinavian
Minimum	3.9%	3.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	96.1%	96.2%
Mean	18.6%	27.3%
Median	7.3%	11.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.9%	6.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.3%	38.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	16.4%	32.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	24.5%	30.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.7%	29.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Scandinavians by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Malaysia (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Palestinian (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Belgian (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Malaysia (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Belgian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Palestinian (6.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Carpatho Rusyn (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.0 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	95.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 6.3%
Iranians	95.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 6.3%