Immigrants from France vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,101,474 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,312,622 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%.

Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from France	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	2.2%	0.70%
Maximum	100.0%	10.6%
Range	97.8%	9.9%
Mean	12.6%	5.2%
Median	4.8%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.7%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.2%	6.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	1.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	26.4%	1.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	25.4%	1.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Indians (Asian) by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Belgian (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swedish (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Swedish (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Belgian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from China (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Turks	98.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	98.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 5.1%
Cubans	98.1 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Morocco	97.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 5.1%
Chinese	97.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Serbia	97.4 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| China	97.2 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 5.1%
Asians	97.2 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 5.1%
Swedes	97.1 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Somalia	97.1 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 5.1%
Indians (Asian)	97.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| France	97.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 5.1%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	96.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Japan	96.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	96.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 5.1%
Burmese	96.5 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 5.1%
Jordanians	96.5 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	96.4 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Iraq	96.4 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 5.1%
Paraguayans	96.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 5.1%