Immigrants from Chile vs Australian Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,742,242 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,770,774 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 0.28%.

Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Australian
Minimum	1.5%	2.3%
Maximum	11.4%	12.5%
Range	9.9%	10.2%
Mean	4.4%	5.7%
Median	4.3%	4.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.4%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	7.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.9%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	2.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	2.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Australians by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Serbian (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (4.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Egyptian (4.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Dutch	96.1 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 4.4%
Indians (Asian)	96.0 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	95.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 4.4%
Kenyans	95.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.6 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Kenya	95.0 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 4.4%
Serbians	94.9 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	94.8 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Latvia	94.8 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 4.4%
Egyptians	94.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 4.5%
Australians	94.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	94.3 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 4.5%
Estonians	94.3 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 4.5%
Iranians	93.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 4.5%
Russians	93.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 4.5%
Yugoslavians	93.6 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 4.5%
Scottish	93.5 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| France	92.5 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 4.5%