Hmong vs Celtic Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Hmong
Celtic
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Hmong
Celtics
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Celtic Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,334,539 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,481,769 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 19.3%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.50% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 44.1% |
Range | 11.5% | 40.9% |
Mean | 4.6% | 13.2% |
Median | 4.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 18.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (4.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Chinese (4.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 4.0%), Chickasaw (4.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Seminole (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 92.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Finns | 92.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seminole | 91.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 91.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Celtics | 91.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 91.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Malaysians | 90.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Soviet Union | 90.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
Irish | 88.8 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |