Filipino vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,785,909 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,737,896 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Filipino	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.90%	0.94%
Maximum	14.3%	15.8%
Range	13.4%	14.9%
Mean	4.8%	6.6%
Median	4.9%	5.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.4%	4.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.8%	7.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.3%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.3%	3.7%

Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Oceania by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Taiwan (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and South African (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.6 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 5.0%
Estonians	98.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 5.0%
Serbians	98.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	98.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 5.0%
Filipinos	98.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Hungary	98.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	98.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 5.0%
Afghans	97.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	97.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	97.6 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	97.3 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	97.3 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 5.0%
Austrians	97.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 5.0%
Burmese	96.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 5.0%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	96.8 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Singapore	96.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	96.8 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.0%
Czechoslovakians	96.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.0%
South Africans	96.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.0%
Romanians	95.5 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.0%