Czech vs Brazilian Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
COMPARE
Czech
Brazilian
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Comparison
Czechs
Brazilians
9.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
78.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Brazilian Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,027,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,079,134 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 9.2%.
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Brazilian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 30.8% |
Range | 56.8% | 29.4% |
Mean | 14.4% | 10.9% |
Median | 9.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Chinese (9.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Danish (9.3%, a difference of 0.51%), Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Osage (9.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Argentinean (10.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Asian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), French Canadian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years |
Immigrants | North America | 82.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.2% |
Burmese | 82.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 81.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.2% |
Slovaks | 80.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 79.0 /100 | #143 | Good 10.2% |
Brazilians | 78.4 /100 | #144 | Good 10.2% |
Argentineans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 10.2% |
Asians | 77.7 /100 | #146 | Good 10.2% |
French Canadians | 77.5 /100 | #147 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Romania | 75.7 /100 | #148 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 74.6 /100 | #149 | Good 10.2% |
Hungarians | 74.4 /100 | #150 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 73.6 /100 | #151 | Good 10.2% |