Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Korea Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,703,757 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,507,622 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.88%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czechoslovakian	Immigrants from Korea
Minimum	1.2%	1.6%
Maximum	50.0%	23.3%
Range	48.8%	21.7%
Mean	13.3%	5.7%
Median	11.0%	4.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.4%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	5.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.0%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.8%	3.7%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Korea by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Yugoslavian (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Thailand (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Celtic (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Seminole (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Malaysian (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Eastern European (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Immigrants \| Oceania	96.8 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.0%
Czechoslovakians	96.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.0%
South Africans	96.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.0%
Romanians	95.5 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.0%
Yugoslavians	95.4 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Thailand	95.4 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	94.7 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Turkey	94.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Germany	93.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	92.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.0%
Finns	92.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.0%
Eastern Europeans	92.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.0%
Seminole	91.4 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	91.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.0%
Celtics	91.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	91.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.0%
Malaysians	90.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.1%